SYNCHRONIZATION OF THE TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS IN THE AUTOMATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DYNAMICS OF THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING GOALS

Authors

Yusuf Shodievich Avazov, Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Address: 100095, Universitet st. 2, Tashkent city, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Kamola Abdullaeva, Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Address: 100095, Universitet st. 2, Tashkent city, Republic of Uzbekistan. E-mail: dinara_nandi@mail.ru.Follow

Abstract

Changes in the characteristics of modern ones, reflecting them as the "digital generation", inevitably necessitate electronic interactive, mobile and mixed, machine learning, especially in the field of automation and control of technological processes and production. As a consequence of reflecting these realities, there have been parallel changes in the taxonomy of learning objectives - from the classical to the revised rethought and digital.

In order to study the problem of synchronizing the training of future specialists in the field of automation and control of technological processes and production and funny knowledge in accordance with the dynamics of the taxonomy of learning objectives, we recommend using the following methods: clarifying the concepts of "blended learning", "e-learning", "mobile learning" and " electronic learning object”; considered, the characteristics of the digital generation; traces the evolution of the taxonomy of learning objectives; clarifies the levels of interactivity that are achieved when creating electronic learning objects for the implementation of blended learning; offers digital tools and original tools that learners master to create e-learning objects for higher cognitive levels of Bloom's digital taxonomy - assessment and creation.

The article notes the advantages of mastering the tools for creating electronic learning objects with varying degrees of interactivity and the corresponding models for their inclusion in training units of process automation in the implementation of blended learning.

First Page

94

Last Page

99

References

1. Dozortsev, V.M., Agafonov, D.V., Nazin, V.A. et al. (2020). Computerized Operator Training: Continued Importance, New Opportunities, and the Human Factor. Autom Remote Control, 81, 935-954. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117920050124.
2. Varona, D., Lizama-Mue, Y., Suárez, J.L. (2021). Machine learning’s limitations in avoiding automation of bias. AI & Soc, 36, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00996-y.
3. Patle, D.S., Manca, D., Nazir, S. et al. (2019). Operator training simulators in virtual reality environment for process operators: a review. Virtual Reality, 23, 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0354-3.
4. Macías García, M.E., Cortés Pérez, A.A., Izaguirre Alegría, A.R. (2020). Cyber-Physical Labs to enhance engineering training and education. Int J Interact Des Manuf, 14, 1253-1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00704-6.
5. Boyko, E.A., Pachkovsky, S.V., Volnev, V.N. et al. (2022). A Dynamic Training Simulator for Perfecting the Processes in Steam Boiler Furnace Devices. Therm. Eng., 69, 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522040012.
6. Vanderhaegen, F. (2021). Pedagogical learning supports based on human–systems inclusion applied to rail flow control. Cogn Tech Work, 23, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00602-2.
7. EL-Andari, R., Bozso, S.J., Kang, J.J.H. et al. (2021). Review of the use of simulators in learning revascularization techniques. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 69, 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01577-y.
8. Aronsson, S., Artman, H., Brynielsson, J. et al. (2021). Design of simulator training: a comparative study of Swedish dynamic decision-making training facilities. Cogn Tech Work, 23, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00605-z.
9. Gumbheer, C.P., Khedo, K.K. & Bungaleea, A. (2022). Personalized and Adaptive Context-Aware Mobile Learning: Review, challenges and future directions. Educ Inf Technol, 27, 7491-7517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10942-8.
10. Olsher, S., Cooper, J. (2021). Aspects of the teacher-textbook relationship: What can we learn about teachers when they tag didactic metadata?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53, 1347-1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01251-4.
11. Capone, R., Lepore, M. From Distance Learning to Integrated Digital Learning: A Fuzzy Cognitive Analysis Focused on Engagement, Motivation, and Participation During COVID-19 Pandemic. Tech Know Learn, 27, 1259-1289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09571-w.
12. Stringer, J.K., Santen, S.A., Lee, E. et al. (2021). Examining Bloom’s Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students’ Approach to Questions. Med.Sci.Educ., 31, 1311-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01305-y.

Recommended Citation

Avazov, Yusuf Shodievich and Abdullaeva, Kamola (2023) "SYNCHRONIZATION OF THE TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS IN THE AUTOMATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DYNAMICS OF THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING GOALS," Chemical Technology, Control and Management: Vol. 2023: Iss. 1, Article 13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59048/2181-1105.1444