•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The article presents a systematic analysis of control methods of dynamic objects under non-measurable disturbances. It is important to study all the factors affecting the control object in order to increase the efficiency of the control system. Due to the immeasurable nature of disturbances affecting control objects, it is shown that they cause negative effects and increase the complexity of control systems in this case. In the control of dynamic objects of this type, the possibilities of control by indirect measurement of disturbances or by estimation of object position and disturbances have been explored. The use cases, shortcomings and achievements of the mentioned approaches are indicated. Robust, invariant and adaptive control systems for disturbance compensation in the control of control objects with unmeasurable disturbances are analyzed. Based on The analysis, is based on the need to develop control systems of dynamic objects with such uncertainties through combined control systems.

First Page

49

Last Page

63

References

  1. Egupov, N.D., Pupkov, K.A. (2004). Methods of classical and modern theory of automatic control. Moscow: Publishing house of MSTU named after N.E. Bauman, 744 p.
  2. Miroshnik, I.V., Nikiforov, V.O., Fradkov, A.L. (2000). Nonlinear and adaptive control of complex dynamic systems. St. Petersburg: Sciences, 521 p.
  3. Emelyanov, S.V., Korovin, S. (1997). New types of feedback: Control under uncertainty. Moscow: Science, 352 p.
  4. Demidova, L.A., Kirakovsky, V.V., Pylkin, A.N. (2012). Decision making under uncertainty. Moscow: Hotline-Telecom, 290 p.
  5. Shankar, P. Bhattacharyya, Lee, H Keel. (1991). Control of Uncertain Dynamic Systems. CRC Press, 544 p.
  6. Matasov, A.I. (2013). Estimation for Uncertain Dynamic Systems. Vol. 458. Springer Science & Busines Media, 422 p.
  7. Slita, O.V., Nikiforov, V.O., Ushakov, A.V. (2012). Management in conditions of uncertainty. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 284 p.
  8. Grigoryan, Eduard Levonovich. (2000). Improving the efficiency of control in technical systems based on indirect assessment and compensation of unmeasured disturbances. Dis. ... dr. tech. Sciences: 05.13.01: Rostov-on-Don, 193 p.
  9. Pankratov, V.V., Nos, O.V., Winter, E.A. (2011). Selected sections of the theory of automatic control. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of NSTU, 223 p.
  10. Lyubchyk, L. (2011). Inverse Model Approach to Disturbance Rejection Problem. Advanced Control Systems. 129-167.
  11. Alekhandrov, A.G. (2003). Optimal and adaptive systems. Moscow: Higher School, 282 p.
  12. Dolbenkov, V.I. (2017). Problems of terminal and optimal control. Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publishing Center, 218 p.
  13. Emelyanov, S.V., Korovin, S.K. (2003). State observers for indeterminate systems. Math modeling. Problems and results. 12-35.
  14. Kim, D.P. (2016). Theory of automatic control. Ch.2. Multidimensional, nonlinear, optimal and adaptive systems, 2nd ed., Moscow:Fizmatlit, 440 p.
  15. Slita, O. (2011). Synthesis of parametrically invariant control systems: development of algorithms for the synthesis of parametrically invariant multidimensional control systems. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  16. Aliev, R.A. (1985). The invariance principle and its application for designing industrial control systems. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 128 p.
  17. Mamirov, U.F. (2021). Regular synthesis of adaptive control systems for uncertain dynamic objects. Tashkent, Knowledge and intellectual potential, 215 p.
  18. Bobsov, A.A., Nikiforov, V.O., Pyrkin, A.A., Slita, O.V., Ushakov, A.V. (2013). Methods of adaptive and robust control of nonlinear objects in instrumentation. St. Petersburg: NRU IPMO, 277 p.
  19. Nikiforov, V.O. (2003). Adaptive and robust control with disturbance compensation. St. Petersburg: Science.
  20. Zhou, K., Doyle, J.C., Glover, K. (1996). Robust and Optimal Control. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 586 p.
  21. Sevinov, J.U., Yusupov, Yo.A., Mamirov, U.F. (2019). Robust Algorithms for Estimating the State of Control Objects Based on Advanced Observers of the Kalman Type. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(11), 11751-11755.
  22. Ioannou, P.A., Sun, J. (1995). Robust Adaptive Control. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  23. Ogarkov, M.A. (1990). Methods of statistical estimation of parameters of random processes. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 208 p.
  24. Kolos, M.V., Kolos, I.V. (2000). Methods of optimal linear filtering. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 102 p.
  25. Malanin, V.V., Poloskov, I.E. (2005). Methods and practice of analysis of random processes in dynamic systems. Publishing house: Regular and chaotic dynamics, 314 p.
  26. Emelyanov, S.V., Korovin, S.K. (2004). Stabilization of indefinite dynamic objects with continuous time. In the collection “New methods for managing complex systems”. Moscow: Science.
  27. Bimbirekov, B.L. (1980). An astatic observing device with compensation for a constant unmeasured perturbation. J. Automation and telemechanics, 12, 55-64.
  28. Gaiduk, A.R. (1984). Impact assessment and invariance. J. Automation and telemechanics, 3, 20-29.
  29. Strejc, V. (1982). State Space Theory of Discrete Linear Control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Publisher: IEEE.
  30. Kuo, B.C. (1997). Digital Control Systems, 2th. ed., New York, The Oxford Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oxford University Press.
  31. Krasnova, S.A., Utkin, V.A. (2006). Cascade synthesis of state observers of dynamical systems. Moscow: Science, 272 p.
  32. Mamirov, U.F., Rasulev, A.Kh. (2017). Observer Synthesis Algorithms for Dynamic Systems with Unknown Input Actions. Bulletin of the Tashkent State Technical University. 3, 42-46.
  33. Krasovsky, A.A. (1987). Handbook on the theory of automatic control. Moscow: Science.
  34. Mamirov, U.F., Azamkhonov, B.S. (2020). Algorithms for stable estimation of parameters and state of nonlinear control objects. Scientific-technical journal FerPI, 24, 274-278.
  35. Esakov, V.A., Dudko, V.G., Shlopak, A.A. (2017). Construction of an asymptotic optimal observer of a dynamical system. J. Problems of modern science and education, 38(120), 13-18.
  36. Simon, D. (2006). Optimal State Estimation Kalman, H-infinity and Nonlinear Approaches. Hoboken, New Jersey, Wiley, 526 p.
  37. Igamberdiev, Kh.Z., Kholkhodzhaev, B.A., Mamirov, U.F. (2019). Formation of stable algorithms for estimating unknown input signals in dynamic control systems. J. Technical Sciences and Innovation. 1, 63-67.
  38. Mamirov, U.F. (2019). Sustainable Algorithms For Synthesis Of Regulators In Adaptive Control Systems Of Parametrically Uncertain Objects. J. Chemical Technology, Control and Management. 2019(4), 126-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34920/2019.3.126-132.
  39. Mamirov, U.F. (2021). Synthesis of control systems for multidimensional dynamic objects under parametric uncertainty based on the invariance theory. J. Chemical Technology, Control and Management. 2021(1), 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34920/2021.1.67-72.
  40. Akunov, T.A., Alisherov, S., Omorov, P.O., Ushakov, A.V. (1991). Modal quality estimates in linear multidimensional systems. Bishkek: Ilim, 59 p.
  41. Grigoriyev, V.V., Zhuravleva, N.V., Lukyanova, G.V., Sergeev, K.A. (2007). Synthesis of automatic control systems by modal control method. St. Petersburg: SPbSU IPMO, 108 p.
  42. Polyak, B.T. (2002). Robust stability and control. Moscow: Nauka, 303 p.
  43. Potapenko, E.M. (1995). Comparative evaluation of robust control systems with different types of observers. J. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Theory and control systems. 1, 109-117.
  44. Tsypkin, Ya.Z. (1992). Robustly stable nonlinear discrete control systems. J. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Technical Cybernetics, 4, 103-112.
  45. Solnechny, E.M. (2008). Invariance and astatism in systems without perturbation measurement. J. Automation and telemechanics, 12, 76-85.
  46. Yusupbekov, N.R., Igamberdiev, H.Z., Mamirov, U.F. (2020). Adaptive Control System with a Multilayer Neural Network under Parametric Uncertainty Condition. Russian Advances in Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing: Selected Contributions to the 8th International Conference on “Fuzzy Systems, Soft Computing and Intelligent Technologies (FSSCIT 2020)”, 228-234.
  47. Kukhtenko, A.I. (1984). The main stages of the formation of the theory of invariance 1,2. J. Avtomatika. 2, 3-13.
  48. Greshilov, A.A. (2009). Ill-posed problems of digital processing of information and signals. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga, Logos, 360 p.
  49. Pupkov, K.A., Egupov, N.D., et al. (2002). Robust, neuro-fuzzy and adaptive control methods. Publishing house: MSTU im. N. E. Bauman, 744 p.
  50. Potapenko, E.M. (1995). Comparative evaluation of robust control systems with different types of observers. J. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Theory and control systems. 1, 109-117.
  51. Makarov, I.M., Lokhin, V.M. (2001). Intelligent automatic control systems. Moscow: FIZMATLIT, 501 p.
  52. Vasiliev, V.I., Ilyasov, B.G. (2009). Intelligent control systems. Theory and practice. Moscow: Radio engineering, 392 p.
  53. Druzhinina, M.V., Nikoforov, V.O. Fradkov, A.A. (1996). Methods of adaptive control of nonlinear objects by output. J. Automation and telemechanics, 2, 3-33.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.