IMPROVING SELF-DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF FLOW MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

Elbek Ortikov, Tashkent State Technical University, Address: 2 Universitetskaya st., 100095, Tashkent city, Republic of Uzbekistan. E-mail: ortiqovelbek2018@gmail.com, Phone: +998901092908. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0693-3990Follow

Abstract

The article examines methods for improving self-diagnostics of consumption measurement systems based on artificial intelligence in the context of industry digitalization and the development of cyber-physical systems. It has been shown that traditional flow meters used to measure the flow rate of liquids and gases are subject to mechanical, hydraulic, electronic, and hidden failures, which reduce the accuracy and reliability of measurements. A justification for the need to transition from classical maintenance methods to intelligent self-control methods that ensure the detection of anomalies and hidden malfunctions in real time is presented. A multi-level architecture of intelligent self-diagnosis is proposed, including feature extraction modules, soft-sensor models, spectral analysis, and machine learning algorithms. A comparative analysis of various diagnostic methods was conducted, and it was shown that the integration of AI models allows for an increase in failure detection accuracy to 90-95%. Conclusions have been drawn regarding the prospects of applying intelligent flow measurement systems within the framework of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 concepts, as well as in the tasks of predictive analysis and ensuring the functional safety of industrial processes.

First Page

59

Last Page

67

References

1. Marchenko, A.V. (2018). Intellektual’nye datchiki i izmeritel’nye sistemy: teoriya i praktika [Intelligent Sensors and Measurement Systems: Theory and Practice]. M.: Tekhnosfera, 472 p. (in Russian).
2. Gorelov, V.A. (2021). Intellektual’nye sensornye sistemy v promyshlennoy avtomatizatsii [Intelligent Sensor Systems in Industrial Automation]. SPb.: BKhV-Peterburg, 368 p. (in Russian).
3. IEC 60770-3:2014. Transmitters for use in industrial-process control systems – Part 3: Methods for performance evaluation. Geneva: IEC, 2014.
4. ISO 5167-1:2019. Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices — Part 1: General principles and requirements. Geneva: ISO, 2019.
5. Van der Wal, S. (2019). Intelligent Sensors for Industrial Applications. Springer, 289 p.
6. Liu, Y., Zhang, K., Chen, X. (2021). Artificial-Intelligence-Enhanced Self-Diagnosis in Industrial Flow Measurement Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 68(9). 8652-8664.
7. Khalif, A., et al. (2022). Intelligent Flowmeters: Design, Diagnostics, and Digital Twins. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 86. 102103.
8. Li, H., Wang, Z. (2020). Machine Learning-Driven Soft Sensors for Industrial Process Monitoring. Elsevier, 354 p.
9. Chen, J., Xu, L. (2020). Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Sensors for Industry 4.0. IEEE Press/Wiley, 412 p.
10. Zhou, X., Wu, Q. (2020). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Flow Measurement Systems Based on Neural Networks. Measurement. 152. 107317.
11. Zhang, Y., Lee, J. (2021). Data-Driven Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics in Industrial Equipment. Springer, 420 p.
12. Lee, E.A. (2021). Introduction to Cyber-Physical Systems. MIT Press, 312 p.
13. Ruziev, U.A., Ortikov, E.E. (2024). Methods and means of self-monitoring and fault tolerance in flow measurement transducers. Chemical Technology. Control and Management. 4(118), 70-74.
14. Ruziev, U.A., Ortikov, E.E. (2024). Improvement of methods and means for increasing the accuracy of instruments for measuring the flow of liquids and gases. Chemical Technology. Control and Management. 5-6 (119-120, Special Issue), 138-142.

Recommended Citation

Ortikov, Elbek (2025) "IMPROVING SELF-DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF FLOW MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE," Chemical Technology, Control and Management: Vol. 2025: Iss. 6, Article 7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59048/2181-1105.1740