REVIEW OF MODERN METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION, FORECASTING, AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL OF WASTEWATER BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES

Authors

• Mirkhalil Agzamovich Ismailov, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Phone: +998 33 242 48 47;Follow
• Boburbek Zokirjon o'g'li Mannobjonov, Andijan Institute of Agriculture and agrotechnologies, Andijan, Uzbekistan. E-mail: bbmannobjonov321@gmail.com, Phone: +998 99 900 79 32.Follow

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive review of contemporary approaches to the automation and intelligent control of wastewater biological treatment processes. Particular emphasis is placed on the digitalisation of wastewater treatment plants, ranging from the implementation of automated process control systems (APCS/SCADA-based solutions) to the application of predictive algorithms and the development of digital twins of bioreactors.

Special attention is devoted to mathematical models that underpin the control of bioprocesses. The evolution of the most widely used activated sludge models—ASM1, ASM2d, and ASM3—is examined, as these models describe key processes such as microbial community growth, nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal. It is shown that modern model parameter identification techniques, including extended and ensemble Kalman filters as well as Bayesian approaches, enable accurate real-time estimation of process characteristics. This, in turn, contributes to more precise and robust process control.

A separate focus is placed on intelligent soft sensors that integrate physicochemical models with machine learning algorithms or neural network-based solutions. These sensors are capable of predicting key wastewater quality parameters—such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonium and nitrate concentrations, and suspended solids—and play a crucial role in adaptive control frameworks. Their outputs serve as inputs for more advanced predictive controllers.

In addition, the article reviews a range of intelligent control strategies, from auto-tuning PID controllers and Model Predictive Control (MPC) systems to fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy controllers, as well as approaches based on Reinforcement Learning (RL). The latter are increasingly integrated into digital twins of wastewater treatment plants, creating the foundations for fully autonomous control systems.

A comparative analysis of the reviewed methods demonstrates that the application of intelligent control can reduce energy consumption for aeration by an average of 15–30%, maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations within ±0.2 mg/L, and enable adaptive adjustment of technological operating regimes without operator intervention.

The review covers more than 45 scientific publications from the past decade and clearly illustrates the transition of the sector from isolated solutions towards integrated digital control platforms. Future developments are associated with the creation of hybrid models combining mechanistic principles and artificial intelligence, the implementation of economically oriented MPC systems, the deployment of learning RL agents, and ultimately the development of self-learning control systems for biological treatment processes.

First Page

89

Last Page

98

References

1. Li, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, J. (2022). Digital twin-based smart operation of wastewater treatment plants: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 310, 114802.
2. Kim, H., Park, J. (2020). Intelligent control strategies for biological wastewater treatment: A state-of-the-art review. Water Research, 182, 115939.
3. Rosso, D., Stenstrom, M.K., Larson, L.E. (2021). Energy efficiency in wastewater treatment aeration systems: A review. Water Environment Research, 93(9), 1961–1975.
4. Gernaey, K.V., Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2014). Modelling of wastewater treatment processes: State and challenges. Water Science and Technology, 69(6), 1149–1162.
5. Zhao, Y., Li, Z., Chen, Q. (2023). Advanced process control and predictive analytics in biological wastewater treatment. Environmental Engineering Science, 40(2), 115–130.
6. Zhang, T., Liu, W., Xu, H. (2021). Towards smart wastewater treatment: AI-driven digital platforms. Environmental Modelling & Software, 145, 105273.
7. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. (2000). Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. London: IWA Publishing.
8. Dochain, D., Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2020). Dynamical modelling and estimation in wastewater treatment processes. London: IWA Publishing.
9. Pan, J., Zhang, Y., Li, D. (2021). Online parameter estimation of ASM models using ensemble Kalman filter. Environmental Modelling & Software, 145, 105207.
10. Sharma, V., et al. (2019). Bayesian calibration of activated sludge models for dynamic wastewater treatment simulations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 362, 632–642.
11. Babaei, M., Han, M., Kim, D. (2021). Hybrid soft sensors for wastewater treatment process monitoring using machine learning and mechanistic models. Water Research, 202, 117404.
12. Zhu, J., Yang, X., Luo, K. (2023). Deep learning-based prediction of wastewater quality parameters in biological treatment processes. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 172, 564–578.
13. Nguyen, T.H., Lee, S., Kim, J. (2022). Reinforcement learning for adaptive aeration control in wastewater treatment plants. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 164, 364–375.
14. Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Y. (2024). Model predictive and fuzzy control for energy-efficient aeration in wastewater treatment systems. Applied Energy, 365, 121073.
15. Rosso, D., Larson, L.E. (2021). Advances in digitalized control for energy optimization in activated sludge systems. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 40, 101858.
16. Ivanov, A.A. (2021). Modeli aktivnogo ila v sistemakh bioochistki [Models of activated sludge in bioremediation systems]. Vestnik MGSU. (in Russian).
17. Petrov, P. (2024). Hybrid control methods for aeration optimization. Applied Energy.
18. Sidorov, N.N. (2025). Tsifrovyye platformy v ekologii i vodopodgotovke [Digital platforms in ecology and water treatment]. Ekologicheskiye sistemy i pribory. (in Russian).
19. Gabovich, M.A., Smirnov, V.A. (2010). Osnovy matematicheskogo modelirovaniya biokhimicheskikh protsessov [Fundamentals of mathematical modeling of biochemical processes]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
20. Varlamov, A.I. (2015). Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye protsessov ochistki stochnykh vod [Mathematical modeling of wastewater treatment processes]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 2: Khimiya. (in Russian).
21. Olsson, G. (2012). New trends in wastewater treatment and process control. Water Science & Technology.
22. Belousov, S.A., Zakharov, A.V. (2014). ASM-modeli i ikh primeneniye v upravlenii bioreaktorami [ASM models and their application in bioreactor control]. Avtomatika i telemekhanika. (in Russian).
23. Rieger, L., et al. (2003). Evaluation of IWA simulation benchmark for biological nutrient removal. Water Science and Technology.
24. Ekama, G.A., Marais, G.v.R. (1984). Biochemical models for nutrient removal systems. Water SA.
25. Copp, J.B., & Spanjers, H. (2002). Neural network control strategies for wastewater treatment systems. Water Science and Technology.
26. Wang, Y., et al. (2016). Prediction of effluent quality using random forest. Journal of Environmental Management.
27. Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer.
28. Noutsopoulos, C., et al. (2017). Hybrid modeling approach for wastewater effluent prediction. Environmental Modelling & Software.
29. Rivas, A., et al. (2008). Model predictive control in wastewater treatment. Computers & Chemical Engineering.
30. Shamardin, V.N., Martynov, S.G. (2020). Prediktivnoye upravleniye na osnove ASM3 [Predictive control based on ASM3]. Avtomatizatsiya v promyshlennosti. (in Russian).
31. Bosch, O., et al. (2019). SCADA-integrated MPC systems for wastewater treatment plants. IFAC-PapersOnLine.
32. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control.
33. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT Press.
34. Francois-Lavet, V., et al. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning for control systems. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning.
35. Kosyakov, A.P. (2022). Primeneniye Q-learning v sistemakh ochistki stochnykh vod [Application of Q-learning in wastewater treatment systems]. Upravlyayushchiye sistemy i mashiny. (in Russian).
36. WEF. (2021). Digital twin framework for wastewater utilities. Water Environment Federation.
37. Efimov, A.I., Savelyev, A.P. (2021). Programmnyye platformy dlya modelirovaniya protsessov ochistki [Software platforms for modeling cleaning processes]. Inzhenernaya ekologiya. (in Russian).
38. Zhu, G., et al. (2022). Self-adaptive control systems for wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production.
39. Bengio, Y., et al. (2006). Curse of dimensionality in learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions.
40. Bishop, C.M. (2007). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
41. Shevchenko, P.V., Smolyakov, A.V. (2023). Problemy ustoychivosti neyrosetey [Problems of neural network stability]. Problemy upravleniya. (in Russian).
42. Chekalin, I.A. (2024). Ekonomicheskaya otsenka vnedreniya II na ochistnykh sooruzheniyakh [Economic assessment of AI implementation in wastewater treatment plants]. Ekonomika i upravleniye. (in Russian).
43. World Bank. (2023). ESG strategies in water management. World Bank Report.
44. Astafyev, P.I., Zhuravlyov, K.A. (2023). Tsifrovyye dvoyniki v vodoochistke [Digital twins in water treatment]. Ekologicheskaya inzheneriya. (in Russian).
45. Silva, R., Henze, M. (2024). Intelligent control for sustainable wastewater systems. Water Research.

Recommended Citation

Ismailov, Mirkhalil Agzamovich and Mannobjonov, Boburbek Zokirjon o'g'li (2026) "REVIEW OF MODERN METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION, FORECASTING, AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL OF WASTEWATER BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES," Chemical Technology, Control and Management: Vol. 2026: Iss. 1, Article 11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59048/2181-1105.1751