•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper considers an approach to adaptive-robust control of dynamic systems using generalized anticipation, where the object is described by a locally linearized model. Known self-tuning algorithms show insufficient stability to inaccurate selection of delay or model order. A generalized predictive control approach is suggested, with simulation outcomes showing superiority over traditional methods like generalized minimum variance control and pole assignment.This sliding horizon algorithm is based on predicting future system output signals several steps ahead, based on assumptions about subsequent control actions. One effective assumption is the presence of a “control horizon,” beyond which control signal increments are assumed to be zero. This condition contributes to both increased stability and simplified computational procedures. The selection of forecast and control horizon values allows for various useful algorithm variants to be obtained as special cases. The results obtained are highly effective when using adaptive controllers to control objects with varying delays, orders, and parameters.

First Page

62

Last Page

68

References

  1. Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T. (2006). Advanced PID control. The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society.
  2. Bhattacharyya, S.P., Keel, L.H. (1991). Control of uncertain dynamic systems. CRC Press, 544 p.
  3. Ioannou, P.A., Sun, J. (1995). Robust adaptive control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Kouvaritakis, B., Cannon, M. (2022). Model predictive control: Classical, robust and stochastic. Springer.
  5. Mamirov, U.F. (2021). Regular synthesis of adaptive control systems for uncertain dynamic objects. Tashkent: Knowledge and Intellectual Potential.
  6. Qin, S.J., Badgwell, T.A. (2019). A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice, 93, 104201.
  7. Camacho, E.F., Bordons, C. (2020). Model predictive control. Springer.
  8. Rawlings, J.B., Mayne, D.Q., Diehl, M. (2020). Model predictive control: Theory, computation, and design. Nob Hill Publishing.
  9. Parisini, T., Zoppoli, R. (2021). Adaptive and learning predictive control: Recent advances. Annual Reviews in Control, 52, 25–36.
  10. Sjöberg, J., Zhang, Q., Ljung, L., Benveniste, A., Delyon, B., Glorennec, P.Y., Juditsky, A. (1995). Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: A unified overview. Automatica, 31(12), 1691–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(95)00120-8.
  11. Billings, S.A. (2013). Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118535561.
  12. Yusupbekov, N., Igamberdiev, H., Mamirov, U. (2022). Algorithms for robust stabilization of a linear uncertain dynamic object based on an iterative algorithm. In Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation (pp. 225–232). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85626-7_28.
  13. Paul, W., Baschnagel, J. (2015). Stochastic processes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00327-6.
  14. Alekhandrov, A.G. (1989). Optimal and adaptive systems. Moscow: Higher School.
  15. Lawson, C.L., Hanson, R.J. (1986). Solving least squares problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  16. Gantmacher, F.R., Brenner, J.L. (2005). Applications of the theory of matrices. Courier Corporation.
  17. Ilyin, V.P. (2006). On the iterative method of Kaczmarz and its generalizations. Siberian Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 9(3), 39–49.
  18. Gasnikov, A.V. (2018). Modern numerical optimization methods: The universal gradient descent method. Moscow: MIPT, 286 p.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.